Blake Upsets Federer; Li, Dementieva Upend Venus,
Serena By Chris
Bowers, Special to TennisReporters.net
Mal Taam/MALTphoto Blake finally got over on Fed. FROM THE BEIJING OLYMPICS - To say the
Olympic tennis event has finally come of age this year would be a little
harsh. It would imply that it hadn’t been a fully-fledged Olympic
sport in 2004 or 2000, when tennis had a good Games. But without question
this week’s championships in Beijing have been the most successful
tennis event since the sport returned to the Olympic fold 20 years ago.
Much of it has to do with the appeal of Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal.
Months before their epic Wimbledon final, all seats for the Centre Court
at the Olympic Green tennis centre had been sold, and the pre-Olympic
press conferences for both men were so packed with journalists and camera
crews that safety was almost a risk. Nadal arrived at Beijing airport
on the same day as Michael Phelps, and the buzz around the Wimbledon champion
meant Phelps slipped in largely unnoticed.
As the Olympic community e-newsletter ‘Around the Rings’ reported,
“Bocog [Beijing Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games] may
be struggling to attract visitors to other venues on the Olympic Green,
but tennis fans are flocking to the north precinct of the site. Swiss
ace Roger Federer and his Spanish rival Rafael Nadal are big draws.”
Tennis’s golden event seemed all set to have the dream final, Roger
v. Rafa. It also seemed set to have a medal rostrum that would reflect
Monday’s new ranking order of Nadal at 1, Federer at 2 and Djokovic
at 3. In addition, the Williams sisters seemed to be heading for another
final. But then thunderous Thursday struck.
Thursday is named after Thor, the god of thunder, and after a hazy but
pleasant start to the day, thunder hit the Chinese capital in mid-afternoon,
just an hour before quarter-finals day at the tennis was due to start.
The rain lashed down for four hours, delaying the start of play for
three-and-a-hours hours – and it completely destroyed some of
the biggest names in tennis.
First to go – and most dramatic – was Federer. In his third
round match against Tomas Berdych he had looked back to something close
to his best. True, his forehand was still breaking down more than it
should have, but he moved well and looked sharp at the crucial moments.
So there seemed little threat to Federer from James Blake, the man he
had beaten eight times in eight matches. And yet the result will record
Blake as the winner 6-4, 7-6(2).
To Blake’s credit, he won the match as much as Federer lost it.
You don’t lose to one guy eight times and not try something different,
and what he tried was to belt his forehand for all he was worth. It worked,
but only because Federer was uncharacteristically tentative on the big
points. Blake’s minibreak to go 2-1 up in the tiebreak came when
Federer had won the point, but was too safe with the winning volley into
the open court, and Blake ran it down for a winner.
When asked what the problem was with losing so many matches he would normally
win, Federer put it down to “a lack of practice.” He elaborated
that he hasn’t been able to practice properly since February, and
perhaps shouldn’t have gone to Toronto and Cincinnati, but that
he needed match play. He was his usual dignified self in congratulating
Blake, but he admitted that he was losing more matches than he should,
and talks of “saving my season” at the US Open and the Tennis
Masters Cup.
There is a growing body of tennis opinion that suspects he is in denial
over something. Lack of match practice may be part of it, but he is not
the lethal Federer of the last five years when it comes to the crucial
points in a set, and that is costing him. The Swiss media suspect there
may be a deeper malaise, though none is too sure what it might be. Suspicions
abound about the state of his personal life and his continuing refusal
to appoint a permanent coach, but until the player himself recognizes
there is a problem, solutions are unlikely to be forthcoming.
Ron Cioffi/TRVenus can't get her game
going on hardcourts.Williamses
Flame Out
Half an hour after Federer’s demise, the event lost Serena Williams.
She had wobbled in the third round against Alize Cornet, but looked too
strong for Elena Dementieva, especially after taking the first set. But
Dementieva is a doughty character, especially when competing for Russia,
and despite her losing three games from 5-0 up in the decider, her nerve
held for a 3-6 6-4 6-3 victory which guaranteed Russia at least one medal
given that Russian Vera Zvonareva, whom she’ll face in the semis,
had beaten Sybille Bammer 6-3, 3-6, 6-3. Dinara Safina and Jelena’s
Jankovic’s quarter was held over to Friday because of rain.
By the time Serena lost on Court 1, Venus Williams was leading China’s
Li Na 4-1 first set. An hour and a half later, she too had crashed, beaten
7-5, 7-5 by China’s leading woman player. Venus had the decency
to acknowledge that Li had played ‘the match of her life and there
wasn’t much I could do about it – she really played better
than the best she can play.’
That leaves just the doubles for Federer and the Williamses to get gold.
The women’s doubles is hopelessly behind schedule, which means the
sisters will have to win four matches in three days to pick up any metal.
Federer and Stanislas Wawrinka have a good chance of a doubles medal,
but slated to play the Bryan twins in the semifinals, they may have to
be content with bronze.
Blake will face Chile’s Fernando Gonzalez, who defeated Paul-Henri
Mathieu of France 6-4, 6-4. Nadal crushed Jurgen Melzer of Austria 6-0,
6-4 and will go up against Djokovic, who edged past Frenchman Gael Monfils
4-6, 6-1, 6-4.