tr.net ARTICLES AND PHOTOS AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE
Click here for more information.











Links above in yellow for tr.net members only.

www.tennisone.com

www.foxsports.com/tennis

TVMatchpoint.com

KRC Communications

THE GREAT WILLIAMS DEBATE

tr.net adds commentary written after '01 Indian Wells tournament (see story below)


WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6

Essie Lewis of Cincinnati was totally justified to excoriate the racist fans who booed and called out epithets to Venus, Serena and Richard Williams.

I was there and I am a box seat holder at the tournament. I have written personal letters of apology to the Williamses, hoping they might consider coming back to the desert. But, I don't blame them if they never do.

I think there is an onus on the management of the tournament to directly address this issue – confront them, to be more precise.

I also think there may be more about the tournament that isn't positive to the women players, as Jennifer Capriati again won't play and again Amelie Mauresmo won't be there.

– Terry House
West Hollywood, Calif.


TUESDAY, MARCH 5

What if you showed up for a match and no one played?

I read Essie Lewis's commentary [below] regarding the fact that Indian Wells got what it deserved by losing the Williams sisters and Jennifer Capriati this year. I have a couple comments. First, I was at Indian Wells last year, and I watched two things.

First, I saw the supreme disappointment from the fans who had bought scalped tickets to see Venus and Serena Williams play in the semifinals. It was the most popular ticket in town, and the buzz and excitement about that match were unbelievable. When it was called off literally minutes before it started, the disappointment was overwhelming, particularly from people who had paid big bucks and travelled great distances for the match. Indeed, people stood around in shock and disbelief when it was announced over the loudspeaker that it was off.

Rightly or wrongly, there was a sense that the withdrawal was not warranted. This is not the first time something like this has happened with the Williamses. I attended the final, and I also was disturbed by the booing, but I think it was a reflection of fans who felt they had been cheated out of seeming something they really wanted to see. In no way did I think it was racially motivated.

Serena handled herself very well and by the end of the match, she had won over the initially disappointed crowd. It was well done of her, and the crowd ultimately responded. I can't say that I blame her for passing on Indian Wells, but I'm not blaming this entire incident on Indian Wells and the fans. There are two sides to this particular story.

In any event, Indian Wells is a great opportunity for some other great players to shine: Monica Seles, Martina Hingis, Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin to name a few. I'm sure some great tennis will be played, and I'm looking forward to it. Hopefully I'll get to see the Williamses and Jennifer Capriati there next year and Lindsay Davenport, of course. Tennis will go on. And if there isn't enough on the women's site to satisfy the sponsors and TV networks, they can look to the men's side plenty of excitement there, with Agassi, Sampras, Roddick, Martin, Chang, Blake, Dent and others leading the American men.


– Susan Seemiller
Ventura, Calif.


MONDAY, MARCH 4

Indian Wells deserves no marquee American

Regarding the Indian Wells tournament: I believe the people of Indian Wells are getting EXACTLY what they deserve … a second rate tournament!!!

The way they booed Serena and Venus Williams last year, and the names they called them, was inexcusable. I was hoping neither girl would ever play there again and I'm happy that is happening. It's a bonus that Jennifer Capriati has also decided not to play. That leaves no marquee American players and will obviously not make whatever sports network that is suppose to carry the finals in America very happy.

Maybe those yahoos in Indian Wells will think next time something happens that they don't like. The way they treated those two young girls last year was the most horrifying and totally unnecessary thing I've ever seen at a tennis tournament. Bravo to the Williams sisters for holding on to their pride and dignity!!!

– Essie Lewis
Cincinnati, Ohio


2001 TENNIS MASTERS SERIES INDIAN WELLS

Serena soars amidst scandal

By Matthew Cronin
tennisreporters.net

Editor's Note: Because we have received so many letters regarding the Williams sisters at Indian Wells in 2001, we have posted Matt Cronin's coverage of the event that appeared in Inside Tennis. Both Cronin and Sandra Harwitt also covered the tournament for Reuters.

INDIAN WELLS Meet cheerful and cheeky Serena Williams, four days into the Tennis Master Series Indian Wells after a casual second-round victory where she wowed fans with blazing groundstrokes and her new hot pink dress. "Hot pink for a hot girl," said Williams of her color of choice. "Attractive, a very attractive girl."

Revisit Serena, 10 minutes after her sister, Venus, had caused the biggest hullabaloo the desert had seen since the discovery of the hot springs by pulling out of the sisters' highly anticipated semi with a sore knee.

When informed that few people believed that Venus was too injured to play and that Elena Dementieva had stated the day before that it would be Richard's decision as to who would win the sisters' match, Serena wowed no one with her casual indignation and less than emphatic denials.

"People have freedom of speech," she said. "They can say whatever they want. It's going to happen. Obviously we're sisters, we're very close. People often speculate things like that. People are always just going to speculate things."

God bless America, let the speculation ring. Over the next few days, newspapers, wire services, TV, radio and the Internet were filled with more tennis-related stories than the sport has seen in a non-Grand Slam week during the Open era. Unfortunately, the stories were of the "Are the Williamses rigging matches?" variety.

That Serena was able to fight off the most hostile crowd in California history and subdue hard-hitting Belgian Kim Clijsters 4-6, 6-4, 6-2 for the title is a minor miracle, if you consider that the debate that raged for four days over the Williams' family affairs had ruinous implications for the sport. Serena and Venus rarely read the press and appear sheltered enough that they don't yet comprehend what even the suspicion of matches being fixed can do to a sport like the Black Sox scandal did to baseball.

THE QUESTION ON EVERYONE'S MIND
If the Williamses did get this, then they might not have kept shrugging off questions for the two days leading up to the final and would have emphatically denied the accusations when they occurred. Instead, tennis was bloodied from the moment Dementieva let loose on Wednesday evening and didn't come off the mat until Sunday morning, when the last newspaper hit the sidewalk with Serena's denials. Without question, the Williamses are partly to blame for the scandal.
Who else is to blame? The players who speculated that the sisters' matches have been fixed with no evidence save for how badly they usually play against each other. Senior Sanex WTA Tour officials, who ignored the significance of Dementieva's comments until it was too late; and who have little or no personal connection to the Williams' family despite the fact that the family has been on the tour for five years now. As a result, the situation got so out of control that the tour gave itself a gigantic black eye, one that may take years to repair. Why didn't they act more quickly? Some claim that officials feel that any press is good press and that the players should be viewed more as entertainers than athletes the integrity of the sport be dammed.

So why the meltdown here and why the first two weeks of March, rather than in some other month at some other tournament? Could it be because it was the emotionally volatile Richard who accompanied the girls to the desert, rather than their more mellow mother, Oracene, who is now separated from Richard?

Williams observers say that Venus and Serena are much more skittish when Pop is around and, given the numerous problems that have occurred between Richard and Oracene over the past six months, it's no wonder that both Venus and Serena have played sparingly since last October. At Indian Wells, both the Williamses played reasonably well, but off court, they were as cagey and as defensive as they've been at any time during their careers.

Coming into Indian Wells, Serena had played in only three tournaments since being bounced out of the 2000 U.S. Open quarters by Lindsay Davenport. She won Tokyo at the end of September, but took time off to go to school and suffered a stress fracture in her foot. She didn't reappear on tour until early January in Sydney, where she lost to Martina Hingis in straight sets. At the Australian Open, Hingis took her down again, this time in three marathon sets.
Serena, who ended last year ranked No. 6 but failed to win a Slam title, wouldn't let on to what her goals are this year. "My dad and I already went over my goals and that's where I'm really going to work harder," said Serena, who crushed defending champion Davenport in the quarters. "My goal this year is to reach my goals. … But I like to keep them to myself so I don't put too much pressure on myself or other people."

Venus, who dominated the tour for five months last year, has yet to win an event this year and is playing nowhere near up to her capabilities. Yet in the quarters she slugged tough-talking Dementieva into the pavement in a 6-0, 6-3 victory.
That's when the trouble began KGB style.

DEMENTIEVA CRITICIZES RICHARD
When asked what the outcome of the semi between Venus and Serena would be, Dementieva said, "I don't know what Richard thinks about it," Dementieva said. "He'll decide who's going to win tomorrow." Dementieva said she suspected foul play when she watched the sisters' '99 Lipton final, which Venus won 6-1, 4-6, 6-4. "I remember when they played," said Dementieva. "If you saw the match, it was so funny."

The sisters have played five times, with Venus owning a 4-1 edge. Serena's won once in a fairly inconsequential '99 Grand Slam Cup final.

This wasn't the first time that players have questioned whether the outcome of the Williams matches are decided by Richard. Hingis has repeatedly said that the outcome of their matches is a "family affair."

At 2000 Wimbledon, Serena came into their semi red hot, losing only 13 games in five matches and was favored by many to win it. But Serena fell apart and Venus won 6-2, 7-6(3). "I thought Venus was going to win," Davenport said in the desert. "I just thought that Serena had won a Grand Slam title, whether it was on purpose or subconsciously or whatever, Venus was going to win the match. That was my opinion."

The Williams family chose not to respond to Dementieva's comments during the day on Thursday and it wasn't until after Venus' withdrawal four minutes before her semi against Serena that they discussed it. But now the situation had been compounded, because most observers believed that Venus should have at least tried to play, despite patellar tendinitis in her right knee. WTA Primary Health Care Provider Michelle Gebrian did back up Venus' claim, saying that Venus was unable to pass basic functional testing.

SAMPRAS: EVERYONE HAS ACHES AND PAINS
Pete Sampras rolled his eyes when questioned about Venus' knee. "I guess it flared up, the tendinitis," Sampras said, adding that he would have played if he had a similar problem. "Yeah," he said. "There's always something you're feeling. Every morning you wake up, it's a little stiff here, your arm is sore from serving. I don't think any player on tour really walks out there feeling great."

Because the match was canceled until most people had already taken their seats, fans reacted in anger, raining a loud chorus on to the court when it was announced that Venus was pulling out. A handful of fans went to ticket windows and demanded their money back. "I did everything I could do to be able to play tonight," said Venus.

When asked about her peers' suspicions, Serena said, "We always go out to compete and that's how it's been," said Serena. "I think if my dad would decide, then maybe Venus wouldn't be up 4-1 [in their matches], maybe it would be 3-3 by now. So I don't think so."

Venus added, "It's not a true opinion at all. Everyone makes their own comments. That's how rumors get started. I guess rumors are more exciting than the truth."
But neither Williams yelled, "No," at the top of their lungs, even when they were specifically asked to do so. The next day, the National Enquirer published a cover story that alleged that Richard had rigged their 2000 Wimbledon match. When approached by Inside Tennis the day before the final, Richard said, "I don't want to open my mouth anymore. Every time I do, all that's printed is lies. I'm scared. I'll never talk again. It's all lies. I don't speak English anymore."

So it wasn't until after Serena's ragged victory over Clijsters in the final that the issue was somewhat sorted out. But not before Serena was subjected a two-hour symphony of booing. Serena felt hurt. "I wasn't happy," said Serena, who nervously went down 3-0 in the first set. "I won here before. I don't think I was mentally ready for that. But eventually you get over it and start playing."

In her acceptance speech, Serena told the crowd, "You guys were a little tough on me today. I want to thank everybody who supported and everyone who didn't. I love you anyway."

For the past 18 months, Serena hadn't shown the mental fortitude that she displayed in winning the '99 U.S. Open, frequently skipping tournaments and folding in big matches. But in the desert, she dug within herself and rediscovered the it's-me-against-the-world mental toughness that made her the Queen of New York. "I won a big battle today mentally, more than anything" Serena said.

Serena then (finally) took the Enquirer's Wimbledon claim head on.

"C'mon, it was the National Enquirer," Serena said. "Next thing you know, I'm going to be pregnant by some Martian. It's just not true. It's really kind of hurtful because it's just lies, just scandalous lies. … Besides, I was really trying to make the singles competition in the Olympics, so I was really disappointed about that. I didn't make the singles when I lost. That was heartbreaking for me."

Orginally printed in Inside Tennis magazine.
Call 510.530.2200 for subscription information.

THE SCOOP, FEBRUARY 25

Serena, Venus, Jennifer to skip Indian Wells

home | commentary | the scoop | q&a | features
feedback | reporters | contact us | © 2002 tennisreporters.net

tennisreporters.net encourages e-mail comments on our stories.
Any e-mail sent to feedback@tennisreporters.net will be considered for posting in our
feedback section. tennisreporters.net reserves the right to edit all feedback for content and length.