|
AMERICAN TV NEEDS MORE SPICE
ESPN blowing Aussie Open coverage
To: Head Honchos at ESPN
From: Tom A. McFerson, Tennis Fan
Re: Australian Open Tennis Coverage
To Whom It May Concern:

Ron Cioffi/
tr.net
|
| Courier's fresh analysis is
needed. |
After carefully watching your
coverage of the first five days of the Australian Open, I believe
I speak for the entire American tennis viewing community when
I say:
You’re blowing it.
I’m not in Melbourne this year, so what you televise is
the sum total of my '04 Aussie experience. And I have to say,
and this is said with all due respect, you’ve managed to
take one of the great events in all of sports and turn it into
one gigantic bore.
You’ve also managed, after five days of coverage, to take
a loyal fan base – viewers who have been starved for tennis
for two months – and make them angry and hostile.
And finally, you’ve managed to take your top-notch broadcasting
crew (even without Jim Courier – a mistake not hiring him
back, by the way) and let them cruelly twist in the wind, trying
to make a blowout match seem interesting.
Not seeing where I’m coming from? Disagree? Some examples
of what I’m talking about:
Why, may I ask, with Guga in a steel-caged death match against
John Van Lottum (winning 8-6 in the fifth), do you never stray
from center court? Showing us game after excruciating game of
Justine Henin-Hardenne’s blow-out first round win?
Why, with Taylor Dent clawing his was to a five set, second round
victory, are we stuck watching virtually every point of Agassi’s
obliteration of some Czech teen?
Why, after Cecil Mamiit is forced to retire at the end of the
second set against Hewitt, do you decide to show us the second
set yet again?
I could go on and on, but since this letter is meant to be constructive,
let me offer some advice instead. These are simple changes, but
would have a profound effect on a viewer’s pleasure:
• Feel free to move around
to other courts. On Monday, there were more then sixty matches
played at Melbourne Park. ESPN showed, by my count, only five
– and two were blow outs. Everyone understands Agassi attracts
viewers, but tennis is tennis and a great match is a great match.
Chances are you won’t lose viewers if you cut away to watch
a bit of Todd Martin gutting his way back from two sets down.
• Give another country a chance. A casual fan, judging from
the coverage so far, might think this tournament is for Americans
only. That’s a slight exaggeration, but the airtime has
definitely been American-heavy. Players from other countries play
pretty good tennis, too. Give them a chance. (Hint: Tim Henman
versus Guillermo Cañas is a good place to start).
• Get creative. After his
second round win, Todd Martin said that the serve of Ivo Karlovic,
his opponent, was truly phenomenal. Like nothing else on the tour.
That should have sparked an idea: Maybe we could show the viewers
this serve! Have Patrick McEnroe analyze why it is so great! Those
are the kind of tidbits that keep viewers and tennis fans coming
back for more.
Just few ideas for you to ponder. The good news is that you have
time to correct things. Take a few chances and give us viewers
some credit. Even if Agassi or Roddick or Williams isn’t
on the screen, trust me, we’ll still be watching.
|