TR.net ARTICLES AND PHOTOS AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE
Click here for more information.











Links above in yellow for TR.net members only.

www.tennisone.com

www.foxsports.com/tennis

TVMatchpoint.com

KRC Communications

GRAND SLAM SEEDING CHANGE DOESN'T CREATE EXCITEMENT

Tradition is best served with a return to 16 seeds

FROM WIMBLEDON – On the heels of Venus Williams’s shocking first-round upset to Barbara Schett of Austria at '01 Roland Garros, tennis officials scrambled to come up with a formula to prevent a Grand Slam from losing a top name draw in the early rounds. The masterminds had a caucus and came up with a grand idea they implemented two weeks later at Wimbledon '01 – seeding 32 players instead of 16 players.

This brainstorm was to alleviate the possibility of players that could be deemed “almost seeds” from being dangerous floaters in the draw that could dump top seeds out in the first or second rounds.

To be perfectly truthful, the Williams loss last year at the French was a rare fluke in the women’s game. For the most part, the competition usually holds to form unless there’s a good reason why it doesn’t. For instance, No. 5 seed Kim Clijsters was an upset victim to Elena Likhovtseva of Russia in straight sets Thursday. Yes, Clijsters was a highly seeded player, but she’s been suffering with a shoulder and arm injury all year and has not been feeling very confident on court so her loss was not that surprising.

REVOLVING DOOR SHEDS SEED THEORY
The theory behind the 32 seeds certainly held no magic for the men’s draw on Wednesday when top seeds exited Wimbledon so fast they installed a revolving door at the All England Club.

Gone – second-seeded Marat Safin, a guy with a game good to go on grass courts. But the '00 U.S. Open champion watched his big serve go south with his concentration and his opponent, Olivier Rochus of Belgium, was into the third round with a 6-2, 6-4, 3-6, 7-6 (7-1) win.

Gone – third-seeded Andre Agassi, who won his first Grand Slam trophy of seven career major trophies here at Wimbledon in 1992. Agassi never could get his game in gear against a pumped up Paradorn Srichaphan of Thailand and fell in straight sets. After the match, Agassi looked confused as to what happened and how it happened so fast.

George Bastl
Susan Mullane
Camerawork USA, Inc.

Gone – sixth seeded Pete Sampras, the guru of grass, who won seven Wimbledon titles amongst his record 13 Grand Slam trophies. Sampras should be able to survive a grass court encounter against most opponents on memory, but he couldn’t seem to remember he was playing lucky loser George Bastl and wasn’t supposed to lose in five sets.

Now with the carnage having taken place, the bottom half of the men’s draw has been watered down in a way that the 32-seed concept was supposed to prevent. Sure, there are some names down there capable and deserving of traversing their way to the final – fifth-seeded Yevgeny Kafelnikov, 11th-seeded Andy Roddick, 23rd-seeded Greg Rusedski, unseeded Mark Philippoussis among the contenders. But the names we were more likely expecting to be standing in the final rounds have all said farewell, thereby spoiling the reasoning for 32 seeds.

In truth, what took place here on Black Wednesday is not the typical occurrence at Grand Slams since the 32-seed policy has been instituted at the majors. What normally happens in both the men’s and women’s competition is not much of anything – the first few rounds are not only void of any really big upsets, but the matches frequently tend to be lopsided and dull affairs. While it’s hard to deny that we could have done with a little less excitement yesterday and would have preferred not to lose Sampras, Agassi and Safin in one fell swoop, that’s the way it happened.

Trying to prevent top players from being toppled in the early rounds hasn’t enhanced the interest at Grand Slams one iota. And let’s not forget that the player who is ranked 26, 28 or 32 in the world doesn’t truly deserve the seeding protection.

When this policy was first instituted last year this tennisreporters.net correspondent spoke out against the decision. Now that it’s been around for the year I am even more adamant that the change has not been to the benefit of the game. A purist at heart, I suggest we go back to tradition, seed 16 players, let the fun begin and the chips fall as they may.


home | commentary | the scoop | newsletters | q&a | features
feedback | reporters | contact us | © 2002 tennisreporters.net

tennisreporters.net encourages e-mail comments on our stories.
Any e-mail sent to feedback@tennisreporters.net will be considered for
posting in our feedback section. Please include your full name and hometown/state/country.
tennisreporters.net
reserves the right to edit all feedback for content and length
.